Thursday, July 8, 2010
Lindsay Lohan - Victim?
My first reaction to today's news? There are times when I want to beat my head against the wall because that would hurt less than the insanity that surrounds us. This was one of those times. I understand that Lindsay Lohan is an addict, that there is no telling what she would actually say if she was in her right mind, and that she probably wouldn’t claim to be a victim if she was thinking clearly. Okay, that’s about as much grace as I can muster right now.
What makes me want to scream is the fact that this is only the echo of the whining I have heard over and over again throughout my life from people who want to be pitied and saved instead of just growing up. It’s hard work to grow up. It takes a lifetime. But we can shorten that process by simply asking ourselves, “How am I responsible for this mess? What can I control in order to clean up the mess? How can I avoid this quandary in the future?” Sometimes the answer includes getting professional help. Trust me, Just Do It.
Now, the “system” is sending Lohan to jail with a long list of “prescription” drugs to help her ease the pain of this “cruel and unusual punishment” for repeatedly driving under the influence of various substances and quite literally telling the court F U. I don’t have all the answers, for Lohan or anybody else. I just don’t think this is it.
I’m pretty much out of grace for self-appointed “victims” quoting the Geneva Convention instead of doing something to help the people that really can’t help themselves. That’s one of the main areas where I’m still trying to grow up myself – grace. It’s partly because I figured out that if I could take off the “HELLO – My Name is Victim” badge … so can every other person who has been victimized in some way –whether real or perceived.
There is a new name badge waiting for those of us who are willing to let go of the victim identity. It reads: HELLO – My Name is Hope.
Friday, June 18, 2010
On happiness
I came across an interesting quote today from an author named Margaret Runbeck: "Happiness is not a station to arrive at, but a manner of traveling." At first glance, I like it. Then I got to thinking… something is wrong here. See, as we travel through life we run into and across misfortune. Pain, death, violence, injustice. Should I travel through those lands riding the “happiness” express?
Come to think of it, are we REALLY endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights that include the “pursuit of happiness”? And then I realized… of course! What the word meant to Runbeck 70 years ago or to our founding fathers back in the eighteenth century was not what the word has come to mean today. Now, the idea of happiness goes something sort of like this: a state where nothing is missing, hurting or wrong and everything – absolutely everything – is pleasurable and exciting!
Hundreds of years ago, the word happiness meant a pleasant and contented mental state. Today, we use “happy” when we’re talking about bliss, which according to the Random House Dictionary is an unalloyed happiness or supreme delight. Contentment, on the other hand, is a peaceful kind of happiness in which one rests without desires, even though every wish may not have been gratified. Consider the pursuit of contentment, about contentment as a manner of traveling. Not very exciting, is it?
I’ve known my share of people intent on pursuing the exciting brand of happiness. They have been persistently disappointed because that state of excitement does not last long. And that discontent is the very engine that drives our consumer culture. We are constantly bombarded with seeds of discontent so that we will go buy something in the effort to be something because what we already have is never good enough - or so they say. I read somewhere that as long as we primarily identify ourselves and others as consumers, we are unable to build true community except with those in our own very narrow economic bracket. That’s a sad and lonely place to be.
Contentment, on the other hand, seems to mark the wise as their constant companion. And so I thought about that as a manner of traveling. When I am at peace with myself and my situation, when I am at rest with the nature of my life, my family, my home, my work – whatever – then I am able to give. When I’m not consumed with grasping for the next shiny thing or hanging on to whatever I’ve managed to accumulate – be it material or interpersonal – then I have open hands with which to give. When I give away goods, services, comfort, instruction, encouragement, companionship… I keep the love (the life-force) flowing. That’s good. And it has never stopped me from improving my work, my home or my relationships.
When my standard becomes Constant Bliss, the love stops and the me-centeredness takes over. That’s not who I want to be, it’s not how I want to travel. I don't want my circumstances in the driver's seat. Give me life, liberty, and the pursuit of contentment. That pursuit is an inner thing; one could say it is a spiritual journey. It’s working for me.
Come to think of it, are we REALLY endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights that include the “pursuit of happiness”? And then I realized… of course! What the word meant to Runbeck 70 years ago or to our founding fathers back in the eighteenth century was not what the word has come to mean today. Now, the idea of happiness goes something sort of like this: a state where nothing is missing, hurting or wrong and everything – absolutely everything – is pleasurable and exciting!
Hundreds of years ago, the word happiness meant a pleasant and contented mental state. Today, we use “happy” when we’re talking about bliss, which according to the Random House Dictionary is an unalloyed happiness or supreme delight. Contentment, on the other hand, is a peaceful kind of happiness in which one rests without desires, even though every wish may not have been gratified. Consider the pursuit of contentment, about contentment as a manner of traveling. Not very exciting, is it?
I’ve known my share of people intent on pursuing the exciting brand of happiness. They have been persistently disappointed because that state of excitement does not last long. And that discontent is the very engine that drives our consumer culture. We are constantly bombarded with seeds of discontent so that we will go buy something in the effort to be something because what we already have is never good enough - or so they say. I read somewhere that as long as we primarily identify ourselves and others as consumers, we are unable to build true community except with those in our own very narrow economic bracket. That’s a sad and lonely place to be.
Contentment, on the other hand, seems to mark the wise as their constant companion. And so I thought about that as a manner of traveling. When I am at peace with myself and my situation, when I am at rest with the nature of my life, my family, my home, my work – whatever – then I am able to give. When I’m not consumed with grasping for the next shiny thing or hanging on to whatever I’ve managed to accumulate – be it material or interpersonal – then I have open hands with which to give. When I give away goods, services, comfort, instruction, encouragement, companionship… I keep the love (the life-force) flowing. That’s good. And it has never stopped me from improving my work, my home or my relationships.
When my standard becomes Constant Bliss, the love stops and the me-centeredness takes over. That’s not who I want to be, it’s not how I want to travel. I don't want my circumstances in the driver's seat. Give me life, liberty, and the pursuit of contentment. That pursuit is an inner thing; one could say it is a spiritual journey. It’s working for me.
Sunday, May 9, 2010
On Motherhood: The Ultimate Perspective-Changer
On the week leading up to Mother’s Day, I found myself pondering Oprah’s recent interview of Ms. Rielle (pronounced a lot like the word “real”) Hunter, a former presidential candidate’s mistress and the mother of the child they conceived while said candidate’s wife was battling cancer.
Here is how one Time magazine columnist described it:
Hunter… has the knack of articulating completely narcissistic and delusional thoughts with a disarming blitheness. She's puzzled that people think her remotely culpable in the affair. For her, the right and obvious thing to do is always to follow "your own truth" and to be really "authentic," even when such authenticity requires you to buy your married lover a secret phone so he can call you without anyone knowing.
What the columnist missed is that Ms. Hunter was still articulating her old belief system while actually living according to the fact that a mother’s decisions are no longer her own – that a mother’s decisions inevitably affect her children. Only a true narcissist can ignore that fact, and Ms. Hunter thankfully isn’t that removed from reality.
This is the truth – the reality – that came out whenever Oprah asked about the contradictions between Ms. Hunter’s personal “truth” and her actions, which included agreeing to lie, at one point telling the world that a different man had fathered her child. Her previous moral compass told her to tell the truth, consequences be damned. But her new identity as a mother caused Ms. Hunter to first think about how her child might feel in the future if this candidate’s daughter one day came to believe that she was to blame for costing her father the presidency.
“My dear,” I wanted to say, in my most sanctimonious elder sister tone of voice, “that is the problem with using yourself as your own moral compass.” A compass that is set to point to me, to my truth, my desires, my preferences, my “needs”, will rarely point to True North. And such a compass will inevitably leave me lost. The trouble with believing that all “truths” are equally valuable is that they are not, at least… not if the consequences matter.
And that has never been more clear – or sadder – than in the case of Ms. Hunter, the once-married Mr. Edwards, and their child. Because in their effort to be “real” to their own selfish desires (that’s right, not “truth” – simple desires), the two new parents caused tremendous pain to many people, not least of which are Mr. Edward’s older children.
Oprah: Do you think you hurt Elizabeth Edwards?
Hunter: She was hurt by the process.
Oprah: You didn't answer the question.
Hunter: Do I think I hurt Elizabeth? Um, you would have to ask Elizabeth that. I don't know.
Oh, BS! I don’t need to ask Elizabeth and neither does Oprah. We don’t need to ask Elizabeth’s children. We don’t need to ask thousands of former John Edwards supporters. And we don’t need to ask the baby. What we do has consequences. That’s the truth that motherhood is beginning to teach Ms. Hunter – that is what is ultimately real, Rielle. At least part of the measure by which we select our moral compass should be the effect that following that compass has on others.
And now, if you will excuse me, I need to go check my own path. What am I leaving behind – as a mother and as a human? Should I be glad that Oprah’s not interested in interviewing me?
Here is how one Time magazine columnist described it:
Hunter… has the knack of articulating completely narcissistic and delusional thoughts with a disarming blitheness. She's puzzled that people think her remotely culpable in the affair. For her, the right and obvious thing to do is always to follow "your own truth" and to be really "authentic," even when such authenticity requires you to buy your married lover a secret phone so he can call you without anyone knowing.
What the columnist missed is that Ms. Hunter was still articulating her old belief system while actually living according to the fact that a mother’s decisions are no longer her own – that a mother’s decisions inevitably affect her children. Only a true narcissist can ignore that fact, and Ms. Hunter thankfully isn’t that removed from reality.
This is the truth – the reality – that came out whenever Oprah asked about the contradictions between Ms. Hunter’s personal “truth” and her actions, which included agreeing to lie, at one point telling the world that a different man had fathered her child. Her previous moral compass told her to tell the truth, consequences be damned. But her new identity as a mother caused Ms. Hunter to first think about how her child might feel in the future if this candidate’s daughter one day came to believe that she was to blame for costing her father the presidency.
“My dear,” I wanted to say, in my most sanctimonious elder sister tone of voice, “that is the problem with using yourself as your own moral compass.” A compass that is set to point to me, to my truth, my desires, my preferences, my “needs”, will rarely point to True North. And such a compass will inevitably leave me lost. The trouble with believing that all “truths” are equally valuable is that they are not, at least… not if the consequences matter.
And that has never been more clear – or sadder – than in the case of Ms. Hunter, the once-married Mr. Edwards, and their child. Because in their effort to be “real” to their own selfish desires (that’s right, not “truth” – simple desires), the two new parents caused tremendous pain to many people, not least of which are Mr. Edward’s older children.
Oprah: Do you think you hurt Elizabeth Edwards?
Hunter: She was hurt by the process.
Oprah: You didn't answer the question.
Hunter: Do I think I hurt Elizabeth? Um, you would have to ask Elizabeth that. I don't know.
Oh, BS! I don’t need to ask Elizabeth and neither does Oprah. We don’t need to ask Elizabeth’s children. We don’t need to ask thousands of former John Edwards supporters. And we don’t need to ask the baby. What we do has consequences. That’s the truth that motherhood is beginning to teach Ms. Hunter – that is what is ultimately real, Rielle. At least part of the measure by which we select our moral compass should be the effect that following that compass has on others.
And now, if you will excuse me, I need to go check my own path. What am I leaving behind – as a mother and as a human? Should I be glad that Oprah’s not interested in interviewing me?
Monday, April 12, 2010
The Question That Cripples
I had the chance to chat with some new online friends today. The subject was why humans have to deal with incredibly difficult circumstances like crippling illnesses. So that got me thinking – why do we ask why? I think maybe we think that if there’s a cosmic reason for our hardship then it will still be hard, but it won’t FEEL so unfair or cruel. And, if there is no reason, then we have a right to demand justice, a.k.a. healing. Right?
Do we really get much of a return on the investment of time and energy we put into chasing an answer to the why-question? Frankly, I’ve had much better results from asking the “now what?” question. What do I do in the midst of my circumstance? How much good can I squeeze out of life despite the situation? I ask myself what can I do now – whom can I connect with – that would have been unreachable before I reached my current state of health – finances – whatever.
I have a friend that became a quadriplegic in his late twenties. He’s had to spend some time living in nursing facilities in order to undergo physical therapy away from his hometown. You wouldn’t believe the influence he has had on others within that situation. Before his accident, he would never have set foot in one of those facilities, let alone been taken seriously. Should we throw a party to celebrate his paralysis? Of course not! But we should celebrate his life. We should see beyond his limitations to all the barriers he has broken. I don’t think of him as somebody to be pitied, I think of him as someone to be admired.
And I am so glad he did not waste his life on asking why or on seeking justice. Bitterness is the much greater form of paralysis.
Refuse to be paralyzed by bitterness or self-pity. Refuse to be paralyzed by shame or by pity for the family members who are affected by your condition. Celebrate having one more day to live, one more day to make a difference, one more day to shine through all the crap, all the pain, all the unfairness, all the abuse, all the brokenness, all the loneliness, all the rejection, and all the physical hardships.
Live!
Do we really get much of a return on the investment of time and energy we put into chasing an answer to the why-question? Frankly, I’ve had much better results from asking the “now what?” question. What do I do in the midst of my circumstance? How much good can I squeeze out of life despite the situation? I ask myself what can I do now – whom can I connect with – that would have been unreachable before I reached my current state of health – finances – whatever.
I have a friend that became a quadriplegic in his late twenties. He’s had to spend some time living in nursing facilities in order to undergo physical therapy away from his hometown. You wouldn’t believe the influence he has had on others within that situation. Before his accident, he would never have set foot in one of those facilities, let alone been taken seriously. Should we throw a party to celebrate his paralysis? Of course not! But we should celebrate his life. We should see beyond his limitations to all the barriers he has broken. I don’t think of him as somebody to be pitied, I think of him as someone to be admired.
And I am so glad he did not waste his life on asking why or on seeking justice. Bitterness is the much greater form of paralysis.
Refuse to be paralyzed by bitterness or self-pity. Refuse to be paralyzed by shame or by pity for the family members who are affected by your condition. Celebrate having one more day to live, one more day to make a difference, one more day to shine through all the crap, all the pain, all the unfairness, all the abuse, all the brokenness, all the loneliness, all the rejection, and all the physical hardships.
Live!
Thursday, April 1, 2010
Stuck? Try Gratitude
Poor, poor pitiful me
Poor, poor pitiful me
All these boys won't let me be
Lord have mercy on me
Woe is me
(from a Linda Ronstadt song)
Long, long, ago, in a galaxy far, far, away.... well, not really that far or that long ago but it has been a while... I lived through a difficult situation for many years. During that time, it was easy to feel sorry for myself, constantly keeping track of what was wrong or missing in my situation. It was darn near impossible to count my blessings.
Here's what I did: I recalled words from Desiderata, a poem that says "there will always be greater and lesser persons than yourself" and realized that somewhere out there was someone who was in a worse condition. In fact, I'll bet that for every life there are at least a dozen people somewhere in the world who would give up almost anything in order to have what you have. Maybe you can breathe without an oxygen tank. Maybe you can walk on your own two feet. Maybe you have at least one family member who cares about you. Plenty of others don’t have these gifts.
I decided that I would be the person who most appreciated my life - no matter what was missing or painful or going wrong at the time. That doesn't mean I ignored my problems, or celebrated the misbehavior of others or accepted abuse, only that I found a way to identify and appreciate the areas in which I was blessed within my difficult situation.
Eventually that situation ended and things got better. You would think it would be easy-breezy to count my blessings now! And yes, it is easier, but my human nature still there, still wants to focus on everything that is missing or broken. The difference is that after all those years of disciplining myself to focus on the good, counting my blessings now comes much more naturally. It doesn't come naturally because the situation has changed - it comes naturally primarily because I have changed.
Stepping outside our own circumstances and looking at our situation from the point of view of someone who is much worse off helps us to quickly identify our blessings. You simply assume that there is someone out there who would love to trade places with you and try to imagine who that might be. Then you say "thank you" for at least one area where you are better off than those who have no home, no health, no friends, no family, no job, no dreams, no future. Gratitude is a powerful thing and can be the starting point for getting unstuck and un-miserable.
[You can follow this blog at: http://perspectivemd.blogspot.com/ ]
Poor, poor pitiful me
All these boys won't let me be
Lord have mercy on me
Woe is me
(from a Linda Ronstadt song)
Long, long, ago, in a galaxy far, far, away.... well, not really that far or that long ago but it has been a while... I lived through a difficult situation for many years. During that time, it was easy to feel sorry for myself, constantly keeping track of what was wrong or missing in my situation. It was darn near impossible to count my blessings.
Here's what I did: I recalled words from Desiderata, a poem that says "there will always be greater and lesser persons than yourself" and realized that somewhere out there was someone who was in a worse condition. In fact, I'll bet that for every life there are at least a dozen people somewhere in the world who would give up almost anything in order to have what you have. Maybe you can breathe without an oxygen tank. Maybe you can walk on your own two feet. Maybe you have at least one family member who cares about you. Plenty of others don’t have these gifts.
I decided that I would be the person who most appreciated my life - no matter what was missing or painful or going wrong at the time. That doesn't mean I ignored my problems, or celebrated the misbehavior of others or accepted abuse, only that I found a way to identify and appreciate the areas in which I was blessed within my difficult situation.
Eventually that situation ended and things got better. You would think it would be easy-breezy to count my blessings now! And yes, it is easier, but my human nature still there, still wants to focus on everything that is missing or broken. The difference is that after all those years of disciplining myself to focus on the good, counting my blessings now comes much more naturally. It doesn't come naturally because the situation has changed - it comes naturally primarily because I have changed.
Stepping outside our own circumstances and looking at our situation from the point of view of someone who is much worse off helps us to quickly identify our blessings. You simply assume that there is someone out there who would love to trade places with you and try to imagine who that might be. Then you say "thank you" for at least one area where you are better off than those who have no home, no health, no friends, no family, no job, no dreams, no future. Gratitude is a powerful thing and can be the starting point for getting unstuck and un-miserable.
[You can follow this blog at: http://perspectivemd.blogspot.com/ ]
Saturday, March 6, 2010
They Both Begin with “I”
Isolation – an act or instance of detaching or separating so as to be alone.
Interdependence – mutually dependent; depending on each other.
Which is scarier? Your answer speaks volumes about your life until now. We are probably most comfortable with those things that are most familiar. For me, it’s isolation. I kinda like being alone – except for when it feels lonely and I feel overwhelmed – like what’s inside me is simply not enough to handle the world around me. Yet, many avoid being alone like the plague. They need someone – anyone – to distract them from something. Pain? Boredom? Uncertainty? Talking to someone seems to help – except for when it just doesn’t.
Trying to share the load with someone else simply doesn’t work if we insist on still carrying all the weight. Picture this – you and a friend, carrying a sofa from one room to another. You pick up one side but only allow the friend to lay their hands lightly on the other side. You’re not alone – but you’re still isolated, still carrying the whole couch by yourself. Tell me, how’s that working for you?
What’s missing? Interdependence – being willing to trust the other person with their share of the sofa’s weight, while still being trustworthy in carrying your end. That’s the scary part, isn’t it? Daring to trust someone else while also daring to be responsible for someone else’s reciprocal trust?
People were not designed to carry the weight of life by themselves. We also weren’t designed to abdicate all responsibility, forever letting someone else work things out on our behalf. Will those we depend on disappoint us sometimes? Of course! But we disappoint ourselves almost daily, so what’s the difference? The difference is that within interdependence lies the potential for growth; the kind of growth that only comes from confronting our fears and anxieties. Fear of failure. Fear of intimacy. Fear of being really, truly known. Fear of being rejected. Fear of being let down. You know – fear of life.
Take a chance to grow in the presence of another. At least one of you is bound to grow from the experience… and both of you may even grow closer. Close enough to carry the burden together. Close enough to show how truly miniscule the source of our fear usually is, and how majestic the triumph over isolation can be.
When it comes to relationships, “anxiety and fear are feelings we will learn to tolerate, even welcome. They’re signals… that we’re growing.” Louise DeSalvo, “Writing as a Way of Healing”
Will I continue to go solo (I-solate) or dare to trust, to become interdependent with others? And if I choose to partner with you – will I insist on keeping all the decision-making power while you pay the consequences? Or will I really be a partner, one who embraces joint risk and joint growth? It all starts with me - "I".
Interdependence – mutually dependent; depending on each other.
Which is scarier? Your answer speaks volumes about your life until now. We are probably most comfortable with those things that are most familiar. For me, it’s isolation. I kinda like being alone – except for when it feels lonely and I feel overwhelmed – like what’s inside me is simply not enough to handle the world around me. Yet, many avoid being alone like the plague. They need someone – anyone – to distract them from something. Pain? Boredom? Uncertainty? Talking to someone seems to help – except for when it just doesn’t.
Trying to share the load with someone else simply doesn’t work if we insist on still carrying all the weight. Picture this – you and a friend, carrying a sofa from one room to another. You pick up one side but only allow the friend to lay their hands lightly on the other side. You’re not alone – but you’re still isolated, still carrying the whole couch by yourself. Tell me, how’s that working for you?
What’s missing? Interdependence – being willing to trust the other person with their share of the sofa’s weight, while still being trustworthy in carrying your end. That’s the scary part, isn’t it? Daring to trust someone else while also daring to be responsible for someone else’s reciprocal trust?
People were not designed to carry the weight of life by themselves. We also weren’t designed to abdicate all responsibility, forever letting someone else work things out on our behalf. Will those we depend on disappoint us sometimes? Of course! But we disappoint ourselves almost daily, so what’s the difference? The difference is that within interdependence lies the potential for growth; the kind of growth that only comes from confronting our fears and anxieties. Fear of failure. Fear of intimacy. Fear of being really, truly known. Fear of being rejected. Fear of being let down. You know – fear of life.
Take a chance to grow in the presence of another. At least one of you is bound to grow from the experience… and both of you may even grow closer. Close enough to carry the burden together. Close enough to show how truly miniscule the source of our fear usually is, and how majestic the triumph over isolation can be.
When it comes to relationships, “anxiety and fear are feelings we will learn to tolerate, even welcome. They’re signals… that we’re growing.” Louise DeSalvo, “Writing as a Way of Healing”
Will I continue to go solo (I-solate) or dare to trust, to become interdependent with others? And if I choose to partner with you – will I insist on keeping all the decision-making power while you pay the consequences? Or will I really be a partner, one who embraces joint risk and joint growth? It all starts with me - "I".
Friday, February 12, 2010
Heroes R Us
Been thinking about superheroes and justice and why even grownups seem to need both. Can’t say I’ve come to a definitive conclusion, but I’m increasingly convinced of an old hypothesis of mine… that somewhere in our makeup is the need for justice and balance in life.
It’s why I didn’t become a “real” lawyer, you know. Because my view of justice is so darned idealized that no legal system in the world would satisfy me. I could just see myself leaping over the judge’s desk, going after his or her throat after yet another moronic decision not to grant a protective order, or some such thing.
It’s come up recently because of the 23-year-old newlywed who was stalked and killed by an old (old enough to be her grandfather) customer just a few days after a judge postponed the decision on whether to grant her request for a protective order. I'm not blaming the judge and, yes, I know the protective order can only do so much; it’s just the whole idea that pushes me over the edge. Did I mention I have a 23-year-old daughter myself? So this one hit home….
But back to the justice thing… I’m also starting to believe that the reason we are drawn to fictional superheroes is because being a hero is also part of our makeup. Not only is it something we want to be – it’s something we are capable of. Okay, maybe we can’t leap over tall buildings in a single bound, but we can each be a hero to SOMEBODY. The thing is, in order to really help others we have to wrap up our personal pity party. You know the one… where we go over and over everything that’s ever gone wrong, every injury we’ve ever suffered, every time we’ve ever failed. What? You’re gonna tell me I’m the only one? Didn’t think so.
Because I’ve been through certain disasters (large and small), and because I’ve bothered to do the hard work of learning and healing and letting go, I can now bring at least a little hope to others in the middle of their own catastrophes. Sometimes I can even do more than that. I doubt I’ll ever be a bona fide hero, the kind that gets their face on the news and children named after them. And I really don’t care about that.
Here’s what I do care about: when I was about 12, I decided that my life would only have been worthwhile if the world were somehow different due to my existence; at least a little bit different for at least one other person. It was all about justice, you see… I realized even then that over the course of my life I would be consuming a tremendous amount of natural resources and going through a whole lot of pain. It only seemed fair to give back to the world and to turn the pain into something useful.
And then I got older and realized it wasn’t all about me. There’s a funny story that defines an optimist as someone who can look at a pile of manure under the Christmas tree and happily squeal, “With all this poop, there’s got to be a pony in here somewhere!” I see people all the time who are still trapped beneath a pile of life’s manure. Each time, I think, “Having been through all this, there’s got to be a hero in here somewhere!”
Here’s to the hero in you, who recycles the bad cards that have been dealt to you into life and healing and hope for yourself and others. Cheers!
It’s why I didn’t become a “real” lawyer, you know. Because my view of justice is so darned idealized that no legal system in the world would satisfy me. I could just see myself leaping over the judge’s desk, going after his or her throat after yet another moronic decision not to grant a protective order, or some such thing.
It’s come up recently because of the 23-year-old newlywed who was stalked and killed by an old (old enough to be her grandfather) customer just a few days after a judge postponed the decision on whether to grant her request for a protective order. I'm not blaming the judge and, yes, I know the protective order can only do so much; it’s just the whole idea that pushes me over the edge. Did I mention I have a 23-year-old daughter myself? So this one hit home….
But back to the justice thing… I’m also starting to believe that the reason we are drawn to fictional superheroes is because being a hero is also part of our makeup. Not only is it something we want to be – it’s something we are capable of. Okay, maybe we can’t leap over tall buildings in a single bound, but we can each be a hero to SOMEBODY. The thing is, in order to really help others we have to wrap up our personal pity party. You know the one… where we go over and over everything that’s ever gone wrong, every injury we’ve ever suffered, every time we’ve ever failed. What? You’re gonna tell me I’m the only one? Didn’t think so.
Because I’ve been through certain disasters (large and small), and because I’ve bothered to do the hard work of learning and healing and letting go, I can now bring at least a little hope to others in the middle of their own catastrophes. Sometimes I can even do more than that. I doubt I’ll ever be a bona fide hero, the kind that gets their face on the news and children named after them. And I really don’t care about that.
Here’s what I do care about: when I was about 12, I decided that my life would only have been worthwhile if the world were somehow different due to my existence; at least a little bit different for at least one other person. It was all about justice, you see… I realized even then that over the course of my life I would be consuming a tremendous amount of natural resources and going through a whole lot of pain. It only seemed fair to give back to the world and to turn the pain into something useful.
And then I got older and realized it wasn’t all about me. There’s a funny story that defines an optimist as someone who can look at a pile of manure under the Christmas tree and happily squeal, “With all this poop, there’s got to be a pony in here somewhere!” I see people all the time who are still trapped beneath a pile of life’s manure. Each time, I think, “Having been through all this, there’s got to be a hero in here somewhere!”
Here’s to the hero in you, who recycles the bad cards that have been dealt to you into life and healing and hope for yourself and others. Cheers!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)